Christoffer Lundman tends to choose beautiful historical Swedish properties as the No one needs to be less white Black or brown please just focus on being Less Dumb shirt Apart from…,I will love this basis for his collections at Tiger of Sweden. His M.O. is to dig so deep into the subject matter that he produces not only a collection based on it, but an accompanying book of essays and photographs and, in this case, a piece of contemporary art. For Spring, the property under Lundman’s eye was a summer estate just outside of Uppsala, purchased in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus. Linnaeus was the father of taxonomy: a man who combined a passion for botany with a mania for categorization. His observations about the sexual life of plants a fiendishly amoral 1960s Free Love–style frenzy of “anything goes” pollen-spurting stamen—scandalized strait-laced Christians way before Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection induced total existential crisis. Beyond Lundman’s fascinating book and the egg-bearing marble artwork by his friend, the artist George Henry Longly, that was on display at this new-venue Florentine presentation, the menswear on the show also acted as virile conductors of Big Linnaean Energy. Military parkas and cargo pants in fern-pattern jacquard were wearable hints at a febrile, organic attitude. Printed silk shirting and shorts illustrated with taxonomic botanical sketches based on those with which Linnaeus wallpapered his summer retreat were scientifically cool. The burgundy triple-layered nylon outfit didn’t seem especially on-theme, but it was a look worth cultivating, as was much in this meticulously tended collection. I bring this up just to mention even though I categorize money as a form of wealth*, when someone is doing an accounting of wealth, they could exclude that category, if so inclined. I do consider money as part of the total wealth, as a store of wealth, and something that enhances transactions as a medium of exchange. However, I understand that we would not exist if the only form of wealth that existed was money. So I think it is quite reasonable, if one was trying to get a measure of wealth that contributes to the standard of living and quality of life, for someone to do an accounting of all the wealth other than, that is excluding, the value of the money in the money supply. By the way, I would have preferred to just make the expression for savings be “Savings equals Net Production”. That is where we measure the change in the level of wealth, and that is where one could even include any change in the real value of the money used for commerce, during the period of commerce.